home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1990
/
1990 Time Magazine Compact Almanac, The (1991)(Time).iso
/
time
/
061989
/
06198900.067
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1990-09-22
|
3KB
|
61 lines
EDUCATION, Page 56Teacher or Trojan Horse?Whittle takes on his critics and expands Channel One
When Christopher Whittle unveiled his plans to bring TV to the
nation's classrooms earlier this year, he served up the deal with
the classic pitch: everybody would win. Underfunded schools would
get tens of thousands of dollars' worth of video equipment free,
students would get a news program to teach them that Chernobyl is
not Cher's full name, advertisers would get a captive teenage
audience, and Whittle would make a healthy profit. Despite loud
criticism that the daily newscasts amounted to cynical
commercialization of the classroom, Whittle announced last week
that he was not only going ahead with Channel One but also
expanding his service.
Along with the original newscasts, the reconstituted Whittle
Communications Educational Network plans to offer two broad
categories of new programming. Classroom Channel will feature
educational material chosen by an independent advisory board, which
will also determine whether the channel will accept advertising.
Educators' Channel will offer instructional services for teachers
and school administrators. But the ambitious scheme will still be
funded by four 30-second spots during Channel One's daily newscast.
The new plan no longer requires a school to offer the program in
every classroom.
Whittle touts the new network as a watershed in American
education. The company promises to provide 1,000 hours of free
satellite time and $500,000 annually to make instructional programs
accessible to participating schools. The Whittle network could even
accommodate Channel One's recently announced cable competitors:
CNN's Newsroom, a 15-minute daily newscast, and Discovery Channel's
Assignment: Discovery, an hour of instructional programming.
While the company, which is half owned by the Time Inc.
Magazine Co., is confident the new plan will win approval from the
8,000 schools needed to make its $200 million investment pay off,
Whittle still has not redressed his critics' biggest grievance.
Says Peggy Charren, president of Action for Children's Television:
"The whole thing is still being paid for by selling kids to
advertisers. The Trojan horse now has a golden harness."
The question of advertising in schools has already raised legal
challenges in several states, most notably New York and California.
"If you're paying kids to watch commercials, that violates our
state law," insists California Superintendent of Public Instruction
Bill Honig, who has pledged to cut funds to schools that accept
Channel One. Whittle is adamant that advertising is the only
feasible way to foot the bill. Says he: "Schools have a choice:
either do without, or do it this way."
This spring's five-week tests of Channel One in six schools
around the country were generally well received. "We saw positive
changes in our students," reports principal Stanley Jasinskas of
Eisenhower Middle School in Kansas City, Kans. "They became much
more knowledgeable, and they took positions on issues." Elaine
Green, assistant principal of Mumford High School in Detroit, says,
"The teachers, the students, the parents were all pleased with the
quality and content of the show." With educational leaders and
school personnel apparently divided on the merits of the program,
the battle over Channel One may have just begun.