home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- EDUCATION, Page 56Teacher or Trojan Horse?Whittle takes on his critics and expands Channel One
-
-
- When Christopher Whittle unveiled his plans to bring TV to the
- nation's classrooms earlier this year, he served up the deal with
- the classic pitch: everybody would win. Underfunded schools would
- get tens of thousands of dollars' worth of video equipment free,
- students would get a news program to teach them that Chernobyl is
- not Cher's full name, advertisers would get a captive teenage
- audience, and Whittle would make a healthy profit. Despite loud
- criticism that the daily newscasts amounted to cynical
- commercialization of the classroom, Whittle announced last week
- that he was not only going ahead with Channel One but also
- expanding his service.
-
- Along with the original newscasts, the reconstituted Whittle
- Communications Educational Network plans to offer two broad
- categories of new programming. Classroom Channel will feature
- educational material chosen by an independent advisory board, which
- will also determine whether the channel will accept advertising.
- Educators' Channel will offer instructional services for teachers
- and school administrators. But the ambitious scheme will still be
- funded by four 30-second spots during Channel One's daily newscast.
- The new plan no longer requires a school to offer the program in
- every classroom.
-
- Whittle touts the new network as a watershed in American
- education. The company promises to provide 1,000 hours of free
- satellite time and $500,000 annually to make instructional programs
- accessible to participating schools. The Whittle network could even
- accommodate Channel One's recently announced cable competitors:
- CNN's Newsroom, a 15-minute daily newscast, and Discovery Channel's
- Assignment: Discovery, an hour of instructional programming.
-
- While the company, which is half owned by the Time Inc.
- Magazine Co., is confident the new plan will win approval from the
- 8,000 schools needed to make its $200 million investment pay off,
- Whittle still has not redressed his critics' biggest grievance.
- Says Peggy Charren, president of Action for Children's Television:
- "The whole thing is still being paid for by selling kids to
- advertisers. The Trojan horse now has a golden harness."
-
- The question of advertising in schools has already raised legal
- challenges in several states, most notably New York and California.
- "If you're paying kids to watch commercials, that violates our
- state law," insists California Superintendent of Public Instruction
- Bill Honig, who has pledged to cut funds to schools that accept
- Channel One. Whittle is adamant that advertising is the only
- feasible way to foot the bill. Says he: "Schools have a choice:
- either do without, or do it this way."
-
- This spring's five-week tests of Channel One in six schools
- around the country were generally well received. "We saw positive
- changes in our students," reports principal Stanley Jasinskas of
- Eisenhower Middle School in Kansas City, Kans. "They became much
- more knowledgeable, and they took positions on issues." Elaine
- Green, assistant principal of Mumford High School in Detroit, says,
- "The teachers, the students, the parents were all pleased with the
- quality and content of the show." With educational leaders and
- school personnel apparently divided on the merits of the program,
- the battle over Channel One may have just begun.